Efficacy of iloperidone in schizophrenia: A PANSS five-factor analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score is widely used to assess antipsychotic efficacy, however schizophrenia is a multi-dimensional disorder. We conducted a 5-factor analysis for evaluating the efficacy of iloperidone vs. placebo across these different domains in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Method

The 5-factor model was determined from pooled data from 7 clinical trials (4 placebo- and active-controlled and 3 non-inferiority active-comparator trials of iloperidone) in schizophrenia (N = 3580).Five factors were derived (excitement/hostility [P4,P7,G8,G14], depression/anxiety [G1,G2,G3,G4,G6], cognition [P2,N5,N7,G5,G10,G11,G12,G13,G15], positive [P1,P3,P5,P6,G9], and negative [N1,N2,N3,N4,N6,G7,G16]) from a factor analysis on the covariance matrix of 30 baseline PANSS items using a varimax rotation; factors retained had eigenvalues of ≥ 0.5. These newly derived 5 factors differ only slightly from other 5-factor analyses published by others using different datasets. The analysis of covariance model was then applied to assess these efficacy outcomes from the 4–6 week double-blind placebo and active controlled clinical trials of iloperidone.

Results

Based on the placebo-controlled trials, iloperidone improvements from baseline (least squared mean change ± standard error) were as follows: excitement/hostility, 0.4 ± 0.21 for 10–16 mg, 0.6 ± 0.43 for 20–24 mg vs. −1.0 ± 0.23 for placebo; P < 0.001 for both iloperidone doses vs. placebo; depression/anxiety, 1.9 ± 0.21 for 10–16 mg, 1.9 ± 0.41 for 20–24 mg vs. 1.1 ± 0.22 for placebo; P < 0.05 for 10–16 mg dose vs. placebo; cognition, 2.8 ± 0.35 for 10–16 mg, 3.9 ± 0.69 for 20–24 mg vs. 1.6 ± 0.38 for placebo; P < 0.05 for both iloperidone doses vs. placebo; positive, 3.7 ± 0.26 for 10–16 mg, 4.1 ± 0.53 for 20–24 mg vs. 2.7 ± 0.29 for placebo; P < 0.05 for both iloperidone doses vs. placebo; and negative, 2.2 ± 0.29 for 10–16 mg, 2.5 ± 0.58 for 20–24 mg vs. 1.3 ± 0.32 for placebo; P < 0.05 for 10–16 mg vs. placebo. Active controls validated iloperidone efficacy.

Conclusions

Iloperidone demonstrated positive treatment effects on these newly derived PANSS factors. The 10–16 mg and 20–24 mg dose groups had similar efficacy on the PANSS factors, with the exception of the depression/anxiety and negative factors, on which the 10–16 mg dose group showed statistical separation from placebo and the 20–24 mg dose group did not. At 6 weeks, the lack of separation from placebo for the higher dose group may have been due to the much smaller sample size in that group.

Introduction

The 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Kay et al., 1987)is commonly used in clinical trials to assess the psychopathology associated with schizophrenia. Although the PANSS has 3 subscales – positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology – some of the items assigned to one subscale may perhaps be better conceptualized as belonging to another symptom construct such as “mood” or “cognitive”. This, together with the growing understanding that schizophrenia is a multidimensional disorder with core psychotic, negative, mood, and cognitive components has led to the development of multiple-factor models of the PANSS (Lindenmayer et al., 1994, White et al., 1997, Marder et al., 1997, Van den Oord et al., 2006; see review by Lehoux et al., 2009). These can be used to describe the outcomes of clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia and discern differences in efficacy based on symptom dimensions (Lindenmayer et al., 2004).

Iloperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic that in 2009 received US Food and Drug Administration approval and has a current indication for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults (Citrome, 2009, Citrome, 2010, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 2011). A pooled analysis was conducted to identify 5 PANSS factors using baseline ratings of 3580 subjects with schizophrenia (excluding schizoaffective disorder) across 7 studies (3 non-inferiority active-controlled and 4 placebo- and active-controlled Phase III studies involving iloperidone). After deriving these 5 PANSS factors, the panels were then used to evaluate the efficacy of iloperidone in subjects with schizophrenia from 4 pooled, placebo- and active-controlled clinical trials of 4 or 6 weeks’ duration.

Section snippets

Design and objective

This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from 7 pivotal trials of iloperidone in order to build a 5-factor PANSS model and to subsequently apply it to assess the multi-dimensional psychopathological outcomes across the 4 short-term controlled trials of iloperidone that were originally designed to test the overall efficacy of iloperidone versus placebo in subjects with schizophrenia.

Data sources

The PANSS factor analysis was conducted using 7 placebo- and active-controlled studies including 3582 subjects

Demographics and descriptive data

A total of 3580 subjects with schizophrenia were included when constructing the 5-factor model (2 subjects excluded due to missing baseline data). The efficacy analysis included 1941 subjects (see Table 3). Subject demographic and baseline characteristics for the population are shown in Table 4. Disposition is provided in Table 5.

PANSS factor analysis

Five factors were derived from PANSS analysis for 3580 patients with schizophrenia: excitement/hostility, anxiety/depression, cognition, positive, and negative (see

Overview

Using this 5-factor PANSS model, clinical efficacy was observed in subjects with schizophrenia who received iloperidone 10–16 mg/d for 4 or 6 weeks in terms of a consistent separation from placebo for all 5 factors. Iloperidone 20–24 mg/d demonstrated separation from placebo on 3 of the 5 factors (positive, cognition and excitement/hostility), but not on the depression/anxiety and negative factors. There was no clear evidence of a dose response for iloperidone above 4–8 mg/day across all the

Conclusions

In a pooled sample of patients with acute schizophrenia, iloperidone demonstrated positive treatment effects across the multiple dimensions of psychopathology commonly associated with schizophrenia: positive, negative, cognitive, excitement/hostility and depression/anxiety. The dose range of 4–8 mg/d was sub-therapeutic. The two higher doses had similar efficacy on the PANSS factors, with the exception of the depression/anxiety and negative factors, on which the 10–16 mg dose group showed

Role of funding source

Funding for this study was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation were involved in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

Leslie Citrome, Xiangyi Meng, and Marla Hochfeld participated in the design and execution of the study, as well as in the preparation of the poster presentation that preceded the paper. Xiangyi Meng undertook the statistical analyses. Leslie Citrome wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

Leslie Citrome, is a consultant for, has received honoraria from, or has conducted clinical research supported by the following: Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Azur Pharma Inc, Barr Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Forest Research Institute, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Noven Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc, Sunovion, Valeant Pharmaceuticals and Vanda

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Presented as a poster at the 23rd United States Psychiatric and Mental Health Congress, Orlando, Florida, November 18–21, 2010.

References (18)

  • E.J. Van den Oord et al.

    Factor structure and external validity of the PANSS revisited

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2006)
  • L. Citrome

    Iloperidone for schizophrenia: A review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly-commercialised second-generation antipsychotic

    Int. J. Clin. Pract.

    (2009)
  • L. Citrome

    Iloperidone redux: a dissection of the Drug Approval Package for this newly commercialised second-generation antipsychotic

    Int. J. Clin. Pract.

    (2010)
  • A.J. Cutler et al.

    Four-week, double-blind, placebo- and ziprasidone-controlled trial of iloperidone in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia

    J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (2008)
  • J.M. Kane et al.

    Long-term efficacy and safety of iloperidone: results from 3 clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia

    J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (2008)
  • J.M. Kane et al.

    Efficacy and safety of asenapine in a placebo- and haloperidol-controlled trial in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia

    J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (2010)
  • J.T. Kantrowitz et al.

    Schizoaffective disorder, a review of current research themes and pharmacologic management

    CNS Drugs

    (2011)
  • S.R. Kay et al.

    The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia

    Schizophr. Bull.

    (1987)
  • C. Lançon et al.

    Factorial structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): a forced five-dimensional factor analysis

    Acta Psychiatr. Scand.

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (69)

  • Computational analysis of spoken language in acute psychosis and mania

    2022, Schizophrenia Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    These measures are appropriate in that they are among the primary scales used to represent the severity of positive and negative symptoms of psychotic disorders, both in the clinic and in clinical research. However, several factor analyses of the PANSS suggest that the complex symptomatology of psychotic disorders is more accurately represented by a five-category classification (positive, negative, cognitive, excitement/hostility, anxiety/depression) than a three-category classification (positive, negative, cognitive) (Lindenmayer et al., 1994; van der Gaag et al., 2006; Citrome et al., 2011). Thus, future work examining the relationships of language features with more precise and detailed symptoms categories (as defined in factor analyses using large samples; e.g., Citrome et al., 2011), or with specific symptoms (e.g., delusions and hallucinations), may improve our understanding of these relationships and yield more reliable language biomarkers.

  • Large-scale evaluation of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) symptom architecture in schizophrenia

    2021, Asian Journal of Psychiatry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Systematic search of PANSS factor analysis yielded 142 records. A total of 33 reports across 16,171 participants were included in this analysis (Anderson et al., 2015; Bell et al., 1994; Bunk et al., 1999; Citrome et al., 2011; Dollfus and Petit, 1995; El Yazaji et al., 2002; Emsley et al., 2003; Fong et al., 2015; Fresán et al., 2005; Higashima et al., 1998; Higuchi et al., 2014; Honey et al., 2003; Kawasaki et al., 1994; Kay and Sevy, 1990; Kim et al., 2012; Kumar and Khess, 2012; Lançon et al., 2000; Lancon et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2003; Levine and Rabinowitz, 2007; Lindenmayer et al., 1995; Lykouras et al., 2000; Mass et al., 2000; Peitl et al., 2017; Van den Oord et al., 2006; White et al., 1997; Wolthaus et al., 2000; Wu et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015; Yehya et al., 2017). The meta-analysis results, characteristics of the included studies, and summary of item counts are presented in Table 4, Supplementary Table S6 and Supplementary Table S7, respectively.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text