Elsevier

Schizophrenia Research

Volume 90, Issues 1–3, February 2007, Pages 325-333
Schizophrenia Research

Cognitive insight and psychotic disorder: The impact of active delusions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.09.011Get rights and content

Abstract

While several studies have determined the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS; [Beck, A.T., Baruch, E., Balter, J.M., Steer, R.A., Warman, D.M., 2004. A new instrument for measuring insight: The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale. Schizophr. Res. 68, 319–329] is a useful measure of cognitive insight, a number of questions have remained unanswered. While individuals with psychotic disorders have been shown to have impaired cognitive insight compared to a psychiatric comparison group, it has remained unclear how the cognitive insight of individuals with psychotic disorders compares to healthy individuals. Further, as previous studies have classified participants based on diagnostic classification, it has remained unknown if individuals with delusions and individuals with psychotic disorders without active delusions score differently on this measure. To examine these questions, we assessed the cognitive insight of healthy individuals and individuals with psychotic disorders, both with and without active delusions. Results indicated that individuals with psychotic disorders had impaired cognitive insight relative to healthy controls (p = .005), though individuals with active delusions and individuals with psychotic disorders without delusions had impairments in different domains. Individuals with delusions were overly confident in their own judgment relative to healthy controls and those without delusions (p = .011), though their self-reflectiveness was the same as normal controls. Individuals without delusions reported low self-reflectiveness relative to healthy controls and individuals with delusions (p = .004), though they were not overconfident in their judgment. These results are discussed in terms of existing research on cognitive insight, decision making, and psychosis.

Introduction

It is widely recognized that many persons with schizophrenia have poor insight or significant difficulties recognizing their deficits and need for treatment (Amador et al., 1993). More recently, Beck et al. (2004) have noted that schizophrenia may involve a compromise in an additional kind of insight — cognitive insight, or the ability to self-reflect, acknowledge the possibility of being mistaken, be open to feedback, and to refrain from overconfidence. This form of insight has been thought to have great clinical significance as it taps directly into how individuals with delusions think, making it particularly relevant for facilitating change in psychotherapy (Beck and Warman, 2004).

To assess cognitive insight, the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS; Beck et al., 2004) was recently developed. The BCIS, a 15-item self-report instrument, is comprised of two factors, the first labeled Self-Reflectiveness, which includes items related to the willingness to acknowledge fallibility, the recognition of having jumped to conclusions at times, and the possibility of having misinterpreted unusual experiences. The second factor, labeled Self-Certainty, includes items related to overconfidence. It is speculated that overconfidence may serve to impair self-reflectiveness, therefore the Composite Index, the measure of the person's overall cognitive insight, is determined by subtracting the individual's Self-Certainty score from his/her Self-Reflectiveness score.

To date, the BCIS has been investigated in three studies, all which examined different populations (Beck et al., 2004, Pedrelli et al., 2004, Warman et al., 2004). The initial study (Beck et al., 2004), which determined the factor structure of the BCIS and its psychometric properties, investigated a group of inpatients who had psychotic disorders of various diagnoses and also patients with major depressive disorder without psychosis. Pedrelli et al. (2004) examined the BCIS with a sample of middle to older adult outpatients, all of whom had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and who had, on average, mild to moderate psychotic symptoms, and determined that the factor structure of the measure was the same as it was in the study by Beck et al. In addition, Warman et al. (2004) found that the basic factor structure of the BCIS was the same in a normal population of university students (none of whom had a psychotic disorder) as it was in the original Beck et al. study of inpatients with psychiatric diagnoses. In sum, the studies to date have determined that the BCIS is a useful measure for inpatients with various diagnoses, outpatients with psychotic disorders, and also healthy university students.

While these initial investigations indicate the BCIS is a valuable measure of cognitive insight, a number of points remain unclear. First, how cognitive insight relates to active delusions, as opposed to psychotic disorder diagnosis has not yet been determined. Beck et al. (2004) found that individuals with psychotic disorders were significantly less self-reflective and more overconfident than individuals without psychotic disorders; as group classification was based on diagnosis, not active delusional status at the time of testing, the relationship to active delusions cannot be determined. While Pedrelli et al. (2004) did not directly examine individuals with active delusions compared to individuals without active delusions, they noted that severity of positive symptoms was not related to self-reflectiveness or to overall cognitive insight. Severity of positive symptoms was, however, positively (though weakly, r = .24) correlated with overconfidence. These results suggest that active psychosis may impair certainty judgments more than it does self-reflectiveness, though a direct assessment of individuals with active delusions versus individuals with psychotic disorders without active delusions has not yet been done.

A further remaining question is how the cognitive insight of individuals with psychotic disorders and/or active delusions compares to a normal population. While it has been determined that individuals with psychotic disorders have impaired cognitive insight relative to those with major depressive disorder without psychosis, the cognitive insight of individuals with psychotic disorders has not yet been compared to healthy individuals. Specifically, no studies have included both a population of individuals with psychotic disorders and a population of healthy individuals with no psychotic disorder diagnosis. Despite the lack of such direct comparisons, by examining the results of the three studies that have examined the BCIS, it is possible to develop some tentative conclusions (see Table 1). Overall, it appears that individuals with psychotic disorders and healthy individuals score approximately the same on the Self-Reflectiveness subscale and that both groups are less self-reflective than individuals with severe depression. In terms of overconfidence, it appears that healthy individuals score midway between individuals with severe depression without psychosis and those with psychotic disorders. It appears that the relationship between cognitive insight and psychosis may not be a simple one.

Further highlighting the need to determine how the cognitive insight of individuals with delusions compares to healthy controls, a recent study determined that individuals who were highly delusion prone (i.e., members of the general, non-clinical population who had no psychotic disorder but who scored high on a measure assessing presence of unusual beliefs) were both more self-reflective and more overconfident on the BCIS than those who were low in delusion proneness (Warman and Martin, 2006). While this seems counterintuitive, since no study has compared individuals with active delusions to healthy controls, it cannot be ruled out that the results that were found for delusion prone individuals actually mirror those that would be revealed between delusional and healthy populations. It is possible that individuals with delusions recognize that their thinking may have been faulty at times, but that overconfidence in current judgment serves to maintain delusional beliefs.

The present study aimed to answer a number of questions that have been unanswered in research to date. First, while the BCIS is a useful measure to understand cognitive insight, the role of active delusions has yet to be investigated. In addition, the cognitive insight of individuals with psychotic disorders, both with and without active delusions has not yet been compared to healthy controls. The present study assessed the cognitive insight of individuals with psychotic disorders, both with and without active delusions, and also assessed the cognitive insight of a group of healthy individuals enrolled in a university. Pedrelli et al. (2004) found no relationship between severity of positive symptoms and self-reflectiveness in their study of outpatients with psychotic disorders, and Warman et al. (2004) reported means for healthy individuals on the self-reflectiveness scale that were similar to those reported by studies with individuals who had psychotic disorders (Beck et al., 2004, Pedrelli et al., 2004); Warman and Martin (2006), however, found that individuals who were delusion prone had higher self-reflectiveness than individuals who were not delusion prone. Given these findings, it was expected that all participants would score similarly on the Self-Reflectiveness subscale, with the possibility that individuals with delusions would score somewhat higher than healthy controls. As Pedrelli et al. found that the severity of symptoms was related to overconfidence, a finding that has been extended to individuals who are delusion prone (Warman and Martin, 2006), it was expected that individuals with active delusions would be more confident in their judgment (i.e., they would score higher on the Self-Certainty subscale) than those with psychotic disorders without active delusions and also healthy controls.

Section snippets

Participants

In order to participate in the present study, individuals needed to be at least 18 years of age. Participants were recruited from two locations: 1) a VA Medical Center 2) a small liberal arts college in the American Midwest. At the VA, individuals with SCID confirmed diagnoses of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder who were enrolled in a larger study investigating anxiety were invited to participate. All the participants recruited from the VA were outpatients at the time of testing. A

Results

Results are presented in two major sections. In the first section, individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder are compared to the individuals in the nonclinical sample. For the first section of the results, these groups are labeled psychotic disorder and healthy controls, respectively. The analyses in the first section were done to be consistent with the original study of Beck et al. (2004) which distinguished participants based on diagnostic classification, not by delusional

Discussion

The present study was an investigation into the relationship between cognitive insight, psychotic disorder, and active delusions. While individuals with psychotic disorders, regardless of delusion status, had less overall cognitive insight than healthy controls, the factor involved in decreased insight differed depending on delusion status. Individuals with active delusions demonstrated overconfidence relative to both healthy controls and individuals with psychotic disorders without delusions.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text