Main findings
In this large prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank, we have identified six distinct trajectories of depressive symptoms based on three repeated assessments of PHQ-4 scores among 20 634 participants. These trajectories were labelled as no symptoms, mild-stable, moderate-stable, severe-decreasing, moderate-increasing and severe-stable. We found that trajectories related to stable and increasing depressive symptoms (eg, mild-stable, moderate-stable, moderate-increasing and severe-stable) but not the severe-decreasing trajectory were associated with higher risks of CVD incidence and mortality. Such associations consider potential confounders, including sociodemographic factors, lifestyle behaviours, comorbid conditions and the use of antidepressants.
An examination of the baseline characteristics for all participants across different depressive symptoms trajectories showed that those within the severe-stable trajectory were predominantly younger women. This not only highlights the alarming trend of younger demographics experiencing severe depressive symptoms but also draws attention to the existing gender disparities in the burden of mental health. Our findings were supported by existing literature. Previous epidemiological studies have consistently reported a nearly twofold higher prevalence of depression in women compared with men across all age groups.22 Another recent survey conducted among the general population in the USA observed an increasing prevalence of depressive symptoms among adolescents and young adults from 2005 to 2014.23 Moreover, a prospective cohort study involving 7735 participants in China revealed that women with depression had a higher risk of CVD compared with men,24 which aligns with the subgroup analysis results obtained in our study. Therefore, it is imperative to prioritise efforts aimed at mitigating the burden of depressive symptoms, particularly among women and younger populations.
Compared with individuals with no symptom trajectory, those with stable depressive symptom trajectories over time, either mild or severe, were all associated with a higher risk of incident CVD and mortality. Interestingly, depressive symptom trajectories that changed over time, such as severe-decreasing and moderate-increasing trajectories, displayed differential associations with health outcomes. In our study, despite having substantially high depressive symptoms during the initial assessment, individuals within the severe-decreasing trajectory did not demonstrate an increased risk for CVD, cancer or mortality. In contrast, individuals within the moderate-increasing trajectory were significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality despite lower depressive symptoms at the initial time in this trajectory than the trajectory of severe-decreasing. This highlighted that experiencing severe depressive symptoms at one point in time may not have a lasting impact on predicting the risk of CVD or mortality during follow-up. This finding also implied that if we could implement timely interventions for populations who have exhibited severe depressive symptoms by assisting in the alleviation of their severity, it has the potential to protect and prevent those with severe depressive symptoms at the initial time from developing CVD or cancer or an untimely death. However, most existing evidence relied on a single measurement of depressive symptoms when investigating associations of depressive symptoms with disease onset risk, which may potentially obscure the true magnitude of the association between long-term depressive symptoms and the risk of disease. For instance, a meta-analysis of community-based cohort studies using a single assessment of depressive symptoms found that late-life depression was associated with a significant risk of all-cause dementia (HR=1.85, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.04, p<0.001).3 Nevertheless, in a prospective cohort study of 3325 dementia-free participants, five unique depressive symptoms trajectories were identified after a 10-year follow-up and only individuals within the increasing trajectory had an elevated dementia risk (HR=1.42, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.94, p=0.024), indicating that the risk of dementia varied with different courses of depressive symptoms.11 Moreover, another prospective cohort study involving 2488 older adults of both black and white ethnicity (mean age, 74.0 years) identified three distinct depressive symptoms trajectories based on repeated assessments from baseline to year 5. The findings revealed that individuals following the high and increasing depressive symptoms had a significantly higher risk of dementia (HR=1.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.90).12 The findings from these studies suggest that the predictive value of disease incidence may be better captured by examining trajectories of depressive symptoms rather than assessing depressive symptoms at a single time point. In the current study, we used repeat measures to evaluate depressive symptoms trajectories and investigate their associations with CVD, cancer and mortality. Our findings have significant implications for improving timely surveillance and intervention of depressive symptoms within the population by public health systems.
Due to variations in baseline characteristics and management settings, the trajectory of depression across an individual’s lifespan exhibits significant heterogeneity, particularly concerning episode duration, lifetime episode frequency and pattern of occurrence.25 Several previous observational studies have reported that older adults may experience a dynamic and changeable course of depressive symptoms.10 For example, one study that encompassed 392 participants aged >65 years was conducted to track their depressive symptoms for 2 years. This study identified six distinct trajectory clusters that followed clinically intuitive patterns,26 revealing that depression is not simply a static state but a complex process that changes over time.
Therefore, using repeated data to measure depressive symptoms over time and examine their associations with the risk of diseases may provide more accurate evidence than from a single observation of depression. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to use the GBTM approach to assess the trajectories of depressive symptoms of individuals over time in the UK Biobank and to provide novel insights into understanding how different trajectories of depressive symptoms can influence the risk of CVD, cancer and mortality over time. Our findings highlight the importance of dynamic monitoring and early interventions aimed at mitigating depressive symptoms as a valuable strategy for preventing the future development of CVD and risk reduction in mortality.
Previous studies have suggested several potential mechanisms by which depressive symptoms are associated with CVD and mortality. Biologically, depression has been associated with dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the sympathetic nervous system and inflammatory pathways, which may promote atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, platelet aggregation, arrhythmia and myocardial infarction.25 27 Socially, depression is associated with loneliness, low social support and fewer health-promoting resources.28 29 In addition, participants with severe depressive symptoms were more likely to have unhealthy lifestyles, such as smoking, heavy drinking, poor sleep quality and poor dietary habits. Taken together, these mechanisms likely interact to produce worse effects, which may be involved in the pathways from depression to CVD and mortality. In this study, we found that participants in the stable and increasing trajectories of depressive symptoms were associated with higher risks of CVD and mortality but not in the decreasing trajectory of depressive symptoms. However, whether the mechanisms driving the associations between depressive symptoms and CVD, cancer or mortality differ according to the different trajectories of depressive symptoms that individuals experience over time is still unclear and needs to be clarified in the future.
Limitations
The current study possesses several notable strengths. It capitalises on a substantial sample size, enabling a robust analysis of the trajectory of depressive symptoms. We used the GBTM approach to capture the life course of depressive symptoms, allowing for an examination of the average, variability and direction of variability to investigate the heterogeneity in trajectories among individuals. Furthermore, meticulous control over covariates and comprehensive sensitivity analyses have significantly bolstered the reliability of our findings.
Nonetheless, it is important to acknowledge several limitations in the current study. First, our reliance on self-reported PHQ-4 for assessing depressive symptoms may introduce information bias. However, previous studies have validated a high sensitivity and specificity of the PHQ-4 in screening mental disorders, thereby minimising such potential bias.16 Second, because our trajectory modelling included individuals with data from at least two out of three visits for depressive symptoms, missing data could potentially affect our ability to detect actual effects, causing biased results. However, given the observed symptom patterns (figure 3) and the universally high posterior probabilities of class membership (see online supplemental table 2), we do not have strong evidence regarding the influence of missing data. Third, the statistical power may have been limited due to the assignment of relatively small populations within the trajectory of severe-decreasing (n=206), moderate-increasing (n=177) and severe-stable (n=122), which could explain why no significant associations were found with CVD or cancer. Fourth, the limited number of time points for trajectory analysis could potentially impact the reliability of classification. Future research should conduct trajectory analysis with data sets with more time points to assess depressive symptoms. Fifth, like other observational studies, we cannot entirely rule out the possibility of reverse causality and the impact of unmeasured confounders despite adjusting for a series of potential confounders within this study. Nonetheless, we found that the results of the landmark analysis remained consistent with the primary analysis, which can minimise the possibility of reverse causation. Sixth, it should be noted that our data were obtained from the UK Biobank, which may not provide a fully representative sample due to its overrepresentation of white British participants residing in less socioeconomically deprived areas who maintain healthier lifestyles than the general population in the UK.30 Therefore, caution must be exercised when generalising these findings to other populations.