Conclusion
This study proposes that CRP level was associated with specific depressive symptoms, and our findings indicate a consistent and significant relationship between CRP and fatigue across five independent samples as well as the total samples. However, the evidence does not support a similar association between CRP and anhedonia, sleep problems or appetite changes. This study provides insights into the possible inflammation-related depressive phenotype and may guide the identification of the inflammatory subtypes of depression, which would enhance individualised treatment.
This study highlights that CRP was consistently and robustly associated with a particular neurovegetative symptom: fatigue rather than broad emotional or neurocognitive symptoms. The result was consistent with previous studies, showing a stable relationship between CRP and fatigue. The pooled analysis of 15 population-based cohorts with 56 351 adults demonstrated that a higher level of CRP was reliably associated with the loss of energy.9 Furthermore, a longitudinal study illustrated that baseline CRP levels could predict fatigue 5 years later; the association remained even after adjusting for a series of known risk factors.10 This study also indicated that the relationship between CRP and fatigue was bidirectional: baseline fatigue can predict CRP at a 5-year follow-up.10
In this study, CRP was not consistently associated with anhedonia, sleep problems and appetite changes across five samples. We speculate that fatigue is the core symptom mediating the relationship between CRP and the inflammatory phenotype rather than sleep problems and appetite changes. Moreover, we consistently found that anhedonia, sleep problems and appetite changes were more closely associated with fatigue than other symptoms, especially for sleep problems. Our findings confirm the sickness behaviour theory, which proposes that peripheral inflammation can trigger a cascade of initially adaptive behaviours, such as anhedonia, fatigue, sleep problems and appetite changes. Further research is needed to dissect the interplay among sickness behaviours, which may underlie the inflammation-specific phenotypes.
This study has several strengths. First, this study has a large sample size with five independent samples to maximise generalisability, which offers higher statistical power for network analyses. Second, the data collection involved five time periods spanning 15 years; this study design could allow internal replication in different samples and periods, further confirming the robust relationship between CRP and fatigue. Third, we used a novel and intuitive statistical method to visualise the interactive relationship between the inflammatory marker and depressive symptoms. However, this study should be viewed in light of its limitations. First, it is impossible to identify the causal relationship between CRP and fatigue due to the nature of the cross-sectional design. Second, this study only used one item of PHQ-9 to measure fatigue, which does not adequately capture the nature of fatigue. Further studies need to adopt more comprehensive tools, such as the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory,11 to assess fatigue to reflect the specific domains related to inflammation. Third, we only used an inflammatory marker to reflect systemic inflammation. Although CRP is a reliable indicator of central and peripheral inflammation, not entirely representative of the complex immune-inflammation system, certain inflammatory markers may be associated with specific depressive symptoms. A large sample study observed a fascinating separation among inflammatory markers regarding their links with appetite; higher CRP levels were associated with an increased appetite while higher IL-6 levels decreased it.12 Moreover, IL-1α and IL-1β are involved in the innate immune system, and a previous review article emphasised the vital role of IL-1α and IL-1β in the development of central fatigue.13 Additionally, evidence from both human and animal studies indicates that TNF-α plays a crucial role in regulating the sleep and wakefulness system.14 Fourth, the current study could not account for potential confounding factors due to missing data, such as BMI, smoking, chronic medical conditions and medications; these factors may mediate the relationship between CRP and fatigue.15 Fifth, because the participants were derived from a nationally representative community without a clinical diagnosis of MDD, the generalisability of the findings for patients with MDD was hampered. The pattern of results needs to be confirmed in patients with MDD.
In summary, this study highlights that systematic inflammation is robustly associated with fatigue in five large and independent samples. Our findings confirm the sickness behaviour theory and reveal a specific rather than a generalised effect of inflammation on depressive symptoms. This study may help identify potential inflammatory subtypes of depression. More research is needed to determine if patients manifesting these subtypes are more responsive to anti-inflammatory treatments for depression.