Article Text

Download PDFPDF

‘Brain on Fire’: an extraordinary cinematic depiction of the phenomenon of diagnostic overshadowing
  1. Soumitra Das and
  2. Karishma Kulkarni
  1. Dept of Adult Psychiatry, Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Soumitra Das; soumitratdmc{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Diagnostic overshadowing refers to a phenomenon commonly characterised by a person with pre-existing or recently diagnosed mental illness receiving inadequate attention for symptoms of physical illness, which are then misattributed as manifestations of the mental illness. There are potentially several underlying reasons for this, including diagnostic challenges in establishing a medical cause for the presenting symptoms, likely lack of expertise in medicine, stigma directed towards mental illness, a protean or polymorphic presentation not immediately relating to an established nosology, lack of a reliable evidence base in the area leading to an inability to correlate with established medical diagnoses as well as biases towards treating surface-level symptoms instead of identifying the underlying causes.1 The movie Brain on Fire is based on the real life of the New York Post journalist, Susanna Cahalan. She is the protagonist of the movie which vividly dramatises a presentation characterised by psychotic symptoms with an underlying oft-underdiagnosed autoimmune pathology. Her symptoms included subtle perceptual disturbances, fatigue, depressed mood and apparent withdrawal. Gradually, these progressed to frank paranoia and unstable mood. Thus, her presentation was quite polymorphic where symptoms could have been classified as a psychotic or mood disorder. Further striking changes appeared with the onset of seizure episodes, which pointed towards a neurological illness. However, these were disregarded following a lack of clear radiographic and electroencephalographic evidences.

Eventually, Cahalan was hospitalised following agitation, disorientation and multiple seizure episodes. Her family faced considerable distress due to an uncertain diagnosis leading to inconsistent and ultimately ineffectual treatment. Psychiatric diagnosis was considered when there was no apparent investigative finding. The bedside clinical lobar function tests conducted by her brilliant neurologist ultimately established the need for a brain biopsy, an invasive investigation not part of routine practice. The brain biopsy established the diagnosis of anti-NMDA encephalitis that could be treated with plasmapheresis and corticosteroids.

It is now common knowledge that dramatic psychiatric symptoms can manifest as the early signs of illness in 60% of autoimmune encephalitis cases. The misattribution of these presentations leads to a significant delay in instituting effective treatment.2 Adequate training to increase the knowledge of the appropriate clinical warning signs can lead to a significant reduction in the time taken to achieve a diagnosis of an autoimmune neuropsychiatric condition.3 In fact, there have been reports of cases of autoimmune encephalitis, which were diagnosed following a negative autoantibody test result (31.4%, according to a few studies), leading to further delays in exact diagnostic identification of the condition.4 Furthermore, the access to immunological and laboratory testing is limited, leading to further delays in determination of the diagnosis.5 This process is further complicated in the elderly population whose autoimmune conditions may not be considered as differential diagnoses for neuropsychiatric presentations.6

The film, therefore, contains numerous lessons. First, it demonstrates the need for a thorough neurological assessment along with maintaining a high index suspicion for organic possibility in every ostensibly atypical psychiatric presentation. Second, a trainee psychiatrist should consider the possibility of diagnostic overshadowing and its attendant iatrogenic risks. The film can potentially act as a teaching aid for students of psychiatry and neurology.7

Ethics statements

References

Dr. Soumitra Das graduated from AGMC, Tripura University in India in 2010. He obtained an MD degree in Psychiatry from Kerala University in India in 2016. He then completed his senior residency in NIMHANS (from 2016 to 2018) where he was actively involved in community based research. More than 50 articles he published have been indexed in PubMed and he took part in various projects. He left India and joined Melbourne Health in Australia as a senior registrar. He completed FRANZCP in 2021 and soon will become a college fellow. He is keen on joining large scale projects in neuropsychiatry. He dreams of uncovering mysteries behind complex mental health issues like resistant OCD or schizophrenia. His main research interest includes neuropsychiatry.


Embedded Image

Footnotes

  • Contributors SD formulated the idea, started writing the paper. KK did an extensive literature search and helped in completing the paper. Both worked for revision and modifying the paper as per the reviewer’s suggestions.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.