Download PDFPDF

Rare case report of Van Gogh syndrome in a patient with paranoid schizophrenia
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    'Van Gogh' syndrome - a term to approach with caution

    Dear Sir / Madam - many thanks to Mudgal et al for their interesting and comprehensive case report. I wonder, however, how useful the term 'Van Gogh' syndrome is compared with simply 'self - mutilation'? The term is commonly used to refer to self-mutilation in the context of psychosis, but my contribution to a similar case caused me to research Van Gogh's medical history (1). Although it is commonly assumed Van Gogh suffered psychosis, evidence for this is scant: his behaviour was always variably aggressive and unpredictable but there were no clear 'episodes' with a 'well' Van Gogh in between, and overt delusions and hallucinations were conspicuous by their absence. Sometimes his style of painting is suggested as 'proof' of psychosis but this belies his creative genius. In fact, it seems the traits of aggression and unpredictable behaviour, coupled with a desire to punish himself or others in the context of unstable relations, were longstanding and suggest an emotionally unstable personality disorder. A bull's ear was traditionally given as a prize to victorious bull fighters in Arles, where Van Gogh was trying to set up an artistic community with Gaugain. Van Gogh's 'gift' of his ear to a maid in a brothel , Rachel, (she was not a sex worker) could be seen as a symbolic rather than psychotic act: he and Gaugain were vying for her affections and it is in this context that he gave his ear as a...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.